Date of Award

2019

Publisher

North Dakota State University

Document Type

Thesis

Degree Awarded

Master of Science (MS)

Program

Agribusiness and Applied Economics

Department

Agribusiness and Applied Economics

College

Agriculture, Food Systems and Natural Resources

Faculty Advisor

Hearne, Robert

Description

Growing demand for water and improper resource management over the years have led conflicts among states and countries. This research applies cooperative game theory. The bankruptcy model, where claims for resources exceed their total availability, was applied to Missouri River water allocation during dry years. In this study, five allocation rules were applied. These include Proportional, Constrained Equal Award, Sequential Sharing Rules based Proportional, Mianabadi’s methodology, and a proposed Modified Constrained Equal Award rule in allocating Missouri River water among two agents where their primary purposes were managing the reservoir water level and navigation channel. Selection of the best allocation rule depends on the beneficiaries, and there is no exact method to choose the best. However, this study reveals that the best approaches are proposed Modified Constrained Equal Award and Proportional rules to allocate water among the agents in the Missouri River for dry years.

Rights

NDSU policy 190.6.2

Rights Link

https://www.ndsu.edu/fileadmin/policy/190.pdf

Handle Identifier

https://hdl.handle.net/10365/31733

Share

COinS