Author

Date of Award

2016

Publisher

North Dakota State University

Document Type

Thesis

Degree Awarded

Master of Science (MS)

Program

Animal Sciences

Department

Animal Sciences

College

Agriculture, Food Systems and Natural Resources

Faculty Advisor

Hanna, Lauren

Description

An experiment was conducted to quantify evaluator bias and determine the impacts bias may have on genetic evaluations. Three subjective evaluation methods were recorded (n = 806) at weaning, including docility score (DS; 1 to 6), temperament score (TS; 1 to 5), and qualitative behavior assessment (QBA; 12 attributes). Using Principal Component Analysis, a temperament index was calculated using QBA scores for each animal based on the first principal component as an additional temperament score. The final model utilized fixed effects of date of evaluation, sex, and evaluator (across only) in a traditional animal model to calculate estimated breeding value (EBV) and heritability for each temperament evaluation. Comparisons of EBV were based on correlation coefficients and quartile placements of animals within and across evaluators. Less than 30% of individuals had EBV that were 3 quartiles apart for all evaluation methods, indicating that evaluator interpretation has some impact on genetic evaluations.

Rights

NDSU policy 190.6.2

Rights Link

https://www.ndsu.edu/fileadmin/policy/190.pdf

Handle Identifier

https://hdl.handle.net/10365/28137

Share

COinS